Zeferelli had set the play when it was written, and where it meant to be, which is Verona, Italy. Baz Luhrmann tried to make the play more relatable to his audiences by setting the movie in a more modern time.
However, they both have their pros and cons.
What makes a good book-to-movie adaptation? This mini-essay will discuss the different elements in fiction for each movie and will conclude with an overall rating of the movies. Both movies have a plot as all fictions do.
For example, when Juliet is talking with Romeo and he finds her house, it seems more like what the play said it was like. The plot in the movies was better designed and developed by Baz Luhrmann. Characters were in both movies for it is an essential element in fiction.
One of the major differences was the skin colour. In the play, he is smart, but humorous at the same time. Another big part of the story was the setting.
The biggest visible difference in the movies is the setting. However, Luhrmann has transferred the setting to make it modern, even a bit futuristic. The better book-to-movie setting adaptation was done by Zeffirelli. Also, nowadays, we use the middle finger instead of biting our thumb at someone.
It was slightly unclear whether it was meant to be set in modern times or not.
However, the theme seemed to be captured more in the Zeffirelli film. The main themes of the play was tragedy and love. Overall, Zeffirelli adapted the themes better too.
There was of course multiple scenes of conflict throughout the story. The conflicts were portrayed differently in the different versions, and also they cut some out and included others.
The conflict seemed to be better in the Luhrmann film. His version of the conflicts seemed more like the play and made the viewers more sympathetic towards the victim.
They both had things that were good and bad about them. This entry was posted in EnglishIn Baz Luhrmann’s video, Mercutio was black, but in Zeffirelli’s movie, he was white. In Luhrmann’s interpretation he seemed more naughty and seemed to be looking for trouble more than the Mercutio in Zeffirelli’s film adaptation.
Romeo and Juliet - Zeffirelli and Luhrmann The two main film interpretations of Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" are Zeffirelli's, made in , and Luhrmann's, made in Although they use the same original script written by Shakespeare, these two films are very different.
To assess Baz Luhrmann's use of setting in his film, Romeo + Juliet, we can begin by contrasting the film with the play as it was originally performed in the 16th-century theatre.
The key difference between the manner in which the film and the play deal with location is that the film is primarily an. A groundbreaking film, in that it was the first to have teenagers cast in the title roles. Beautifully shot in Italy, its use of language and imagery captures the essence of the original work.
However, the soundtrack is a little cheesy, and the movie features some wacky costume designs. A highly. Zeffirelli's version of the story is done in period dress, and is a filmic representation of the actual historic period during which the play was written (set in Italy, as the play is).
Keywords: romeo and juliet film comparison The renowned William Shakespeare's play, "Romeo and Juliet" was directed into two movie versions; the traditional version of that was directed by Franco Zeffirelli and the modern version of that followed as directed by Baz Luhrman.